New Indian-Chennai News + more

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: SC considers appointing receiver for Sahara


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 24614
Date:
SC considers appointing receiver for Sahara
Permalink  
 


Aug 04 2015 : The Times of India (Chennai)
 
NO RELIEF - SC considers appointing receiver for Sahara assets
New Delhi:
 
 
 
 
The Sahara group's inability to raise Rs 10,000 crore, half in cash and half through bank guarantee, to seek release of its chief Subrata Roy and two directors from jail made the Supreme Court on Monday think aloud about the possibility of appointing a receiver for the group.

“Let the property be taken over and let a receiver manage the property and give us a report. They (Roy and the two directors) seem incapable of generating the amount for their release. It is not a very happy situation. The way its proceeding, it doesn't appear to be going anywhere,“ a bench of Justices T S Thakur, A R Dave and A K Sikri said. It asked market regulator Sebi to file an application on this.

Roy and the two directors were taken into custody on March 4 last year for their repeated failure to comply with the SC's orders directing two group companies to refund Rs 24,000 crore to nearly three crore investors. It had granted them bail on March 26 provided they furnished Rs 5,000 crore in cash and a Rs 5,000 crore bank guarantee to Sebi.

The bench asked why Roy had not been able to raise the money despite claiming to have huge tracts of land. “One thing that is troubling us is that there is one person who is sitting on Rs 185,000 crore and he tells us that he owns so much yet he is not able to pay .A person who is so blessed with money , he is sacrificing his liberty. It seems you are in jail by choice,“ the bench said.

Roy's counsel Kapil Sibal said it was difficult to raise the money with the head of the group behind bars. He pleaded with the court to release Roy on humanitarian ground. But the court refused, saying it would not be possible without Roy meeting the bail condition.

The bench asked Sibal, “These companies have board of directors. Is it so important that one individual's inability should stop the company from paying?“ The group has so far deposited nearly Rs 3,800 crore.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard