2000 years back, there were no written scripts of Sanskrit, no stone carving / writing could be evidenced. Even, Ashoka period had Prakrit which was spoken breadth and width of Greater India but we could not find any Sanskrit usage.

This is totally biased and unacceptable/half cooked views of studying ancient history from current affairs...

If he claims, Prakrit in place of Sanskrit which makes some sense to believe. Dravidian language is not comparable with Sanskrit which is like comparing Thiruvalluvar with Sonia Gandhi but comparable with Prakrit which nobody is doing so due to their biased views of studying and mapping ancient history from current state

Entire work of Europeans have been keep the entire world as colonies and used Christianity as the tool, as it gave them the title- "Chosen People"- to rule any land and because Bible is such a horrible work, they took Sanskrit with its richness as their own, and called themselves Aryans and I Quote GeorgeBernardShaw- on this 
- .. Bible is hopelessly Pre-evolutionary; its description of the origin of life and morals are obviouly fairy tales; its astronomy is terracentric; its notions of the starry universe are childish; its history is epical and legendery; in short, people whose education in these departments derived from the Bible are absolutely misinformed as to be unfit for public employment, parental responsbility , or the Franchise" in his Black Girl in Search of God- Preface.
Lord Macaulay on whose name our educational system is called, in his letter to his father wrote- “The effect of this education on the Hindoos is prodigious. No Hindoo, who has received an English Education even remains sincerly attached to his religion. Some continue to profess it as a matter of policy; but many profers themselves pure Deists, and some embrace Christianity.
It is my firm belief that if, our plans of education are followed up, there will not be single Idolater among the respectable classes in Bengal 30 years hence. And this will be effected without any efforts to prostytise, without the smallest interference with religious liberty; but by the natural operation of knowledge and reflection … “ I have given the background of BODEN Trust in Oxford University- A Bristish Soldier who amased huge wealth from his Indian Service, made a trust to Uproot Hinduism and to enable missionaries to learn Indian Scriptures and also Translation of Bible to Sanskrit etc., Prof H.H.Wilson was the first to occupy, and Monier Williams was the next and Sir.Monier Williams, the editor of Sanskrit-English Dictionary wrote in his other book “Moderb India and the Indians, Page 62- “When the walls of the mighty fortress of Brahminism are encircled, undermined and finally stormed by the soldiers of the Cross, the victory of the Christianity must be Signal and complete.”
The foolish missionaries underestimated the Indian, but achieved in making a small section of Hindus to hate its root- Vedas and Sanskrit Literature.
My quotes of these Europeans are those words hidden from General, where as they wrote them in Abroad, brought out by Researchers, and sometimes the rivalry among missionaries also helped.

Indologist W.W.Hunter has commented on Bishop Caledwell- “ … but in his Comparative Grammar.. as in every branch of Caldwell’s untiring Labout, he was inspired with the belief that he was doing true missionary services”; and as per Caldwell the word Tamil came from Darvidi-Dramizhi-Tamil; and all Dravidians are not local people, but Alien Settlers from abroad, and he maintained this consistently;.
When EV.Ramsamy Naicker- who was a Kannadar by birth for his New Political Party, which fought Congress and enjoyed Political patronage as Stooges and lot of financial benfits from British called it As Dravidar Kalagam; and surprisingly- the word Kalagam is used In SaNgam Literature as association of Kudikedargal and Suthadigal etc; I quote for the benefit of all ,EVR Naicker’ views on Tholkappiyam and Thirukural as below: 
1. “Tholkappiyan Ariyakooli, Ariya Dharmathiye Tamil Ilakkanamaga seithuvitta Maperum thuroghi. 
2. Thiruvalluvan akkalathirku etrra vagaiyil Ariyar karutthukku Atharavu kodukkum alavil pagutharivaip patrri kavalaipadamal Neethi koorum muraiyil thanathu Matha unarchiyodu etho Koorich chendrar.” The words Aryans and Dravidians do not call any race or people; and today it stands Dravidian as Language group of South Indian Languages and Aryan- as Indi European language group. As for the earlist natives of this land from Tholkappiyam to all Literature stands in favour of Anthanars or Brahmins as Devaneyan agreed. Now to call the earliest Aborgins as aliens and was The Biblic Techinque of Divide and Rule, and spreading hate against Sanskrit and Vedas are part of it. FSG need to specify his research supports for his Blind Beliefs.
On Sanskrit and its kids Latin and Greek- I QUOTE :- Sir William Jones in 18th Cen wrote- The Sanskrit Language.... whatever be its antiquity, more perfect than the Greek, more copius than Latin and more exquisitly refined than either, yet bearing to both of them a Stronger affinity both in the roots and in the form of Grammer, than could possibly have been produced by accident, so strong indeed, that no Philologist could examine all Thre, without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which perhaps no longer exists. “

I have proved beyond doubt, that the Biggest Anti-Tamilar but BIG hYpocrite Tamil Apologist Devaneyan had to agree that Tholkappiyam, to entire Tamil Literature clearly refers Vedas and Sanskrit Literature, and we do not have any Tamil Literature, without the backup of Vedas and Maxmuller took the duty to try to Backdate Vedas and to stop the Idea, Sanskrit as mother of Latin and Greek , which he changed as Elder SIster and this I QUOTE 
Blavatsky the founder of Thesophical Society- "Inflectional Spech: the root of the Sanskrit, very erroneously called the "elder sister" of the Greek, instead of its mother- was the first language, now the mystery tongue of the Intiates, othe Fifth Race. The "Semitic " languages are the ******* descendants of the First Phonetic corruption of the eldest children of the early Sanskrit"- Secret Doctrine. Vol-3 PG 205. 

Maxmuller who showed himself as a secular scholar, in his letter to his wife wrote - “ I Hope I Shall finish that work, and I FEEL CONVINCED THOUGH I shall not live to see it, that this edition of mine and the translation of Vedas will hereafter tell to a great extent on the fate of India… Vedas are the root of their religion, and to show them what that root is, I FEEL SURE IS THE ONLY WAY OF UPROOTING ALL THAT HAS Sparang up from it during the last 3000 years……..”
Sometime Before his death wrote, I quote- “ Even, their religion is not as bad as it looks, as I hoe to show in a book just finished, I have not much faith in missionaries – medical or otherwise. If we get such men again in India as RammohunRoy or Kesub Cahandrasen and if we get an Archbishop of Calcutta who knows what Christianity is, India will be Christianized in all that is essential in the Twinking of an eye, and on this too we must be hopeful” What I Quote are from sincere researches, not known to commonly, and I Quote from the book
The Arsenal of Christian Soldiers in India – Rev.J.Fr.Stacker- “ I am of special obligation to the volumes of Monier Williams, Mitchel, Hopkins, Wilson…. Caldwell, Maxmuller and others , too numerous to mention.”
In a response to an RSS groups book as late as 1985,Indian church maintains that Dravidians, Aryans, and Tribals are all Aliens of Indian Land and I quote- 
“ There is ample evidence that Hinduism is not the religion of India, even if it s older than Christianity in India. There is no reason either Ariyanism or Dravidianism or other religion in India to call the other Foreign. –Page34, Christianity in India- Unique and Universal Mission released by CSI and the same book says- “ Due to Aryan Invasion of 1500BC, the Adivasis fled to the hills and forest and did not integrate with other Indians, ofcourse the Dravidians were more docile and less militant and migrated to South India and Some were absorbed in the Aryan Acculturalisation” page-225. further , I quote 
” The most outstanding fact that we need to understand is that we must know that the Tribals People of the NorthEast Hills are not Hindus by any stretch of imagination, they are the people who Continued to come from parts of Asia at different stages of History. Page 236.
The most of the Indians have been misinformed and like you all and Dravidian movement leaders became a tool on the hands of Church, which in the long run, on Converting they can make Indians as Collanies of Europe as and when Political situation changes Internationally.

TAMIL SANGAM SONG says- a Maduraite Proudly saying, You Chola Capital and Chera capital people wakeup at Cheval Kooval, where as we in Madurai, wakeup at the Divine Vedic Prayers everyday.

I have put with detailed Research opinions of various Scholars on this Vedas and what it refers without any doubt and for every readers benefit I Quote DEVANEYAN again- “ Nal Vetham allathu NanMarai, Arangam, Agamam enpathu ellam Ariya Noolgale enpathum, Thirukural Thavira Ippothulla Pandaiya Tamil Noolgal ellam Anthanar enpathum Brahmanargaliye kurikkum enpathum Sariye. Page- 102 Tamilar Matham
“Samaskrithathil thalai sirantha Ilakkana Noolakiay Paniniyam, Paniniyal KI.MU.4m. Noorandil Iyarrappattathu. Ilakkananoolgalai Viyakaranam enbar Vadanoolar. Annoorkumun Enn Ilakkana Noolgal Iyarappattathach Sollap padugindrathu. Avarrul muthalathu Vetha Kalaththathu enappadum Iyendiram” Page 56, 57, Tamilar Varalaru.

The first Quote was written by Devaneyan in a highly Controversial situation, to Reply a Dubious research book by Ka.Su.Pillai, saying the Vedas are not Sanskrit Vedas and that Anthanar are not the Brahmins, In a Illakiya Megazine- and cannot carry his frauds he was otherwise doing. 

IF Idiyappam or others give other quotation from Pavanar that would disqualify Devaneyan worthy as a Scholar, as I Quote; JOHN W MONTGOMERY- : ”One must listen to the claims of the documents of the documents under analysis, and not assume fraud or error unless the Author Disqualified Himself by Contradictions or known factual inaccuracies”

I Feel you are all gone by the deception of missionaries and having a closed mindset to truths and hence, such a detailed missionary details were to be given.

Truth always is going to help, not false beliefs even if they are close to our hearts. And for the benefit of readers I QUOTE the views of more than 100s of Scholars from America, from Catholic University- in its NEW CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA- "The Beginning of Sanskrit Literature go back to almost 2500BCE, Not only is the antiquity of Sanskrit Literature truly remarkable, but its fecudits, veracity and continuity or no less so” Page445, Vol 7 . and Maxmuller AGAIN- “ To the Scholars, no doubt the Vedas remained and always remain the oldest real book that has been preserved to us in an almost miraculous way.” – My Autobiagraphy- a fragment Page 188 & 189.